<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google/Publicis Deal Part 1 – Google’s Chance to Take Over Performance Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cameronperon.com/2008/09/13/googlepublicis-deal-part-1-%e2%80%93-google%e2%80%99s-chance-to-take-over-performance-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cameronperon.com/2008/09/13/googlepublicis-deal-part-1-%e2%80%93-google%e2%80%99s-chance-to-take-over-performance-marketing/</link>
	<description>internet economics &#38; culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:39:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Yanke</title>
		<link>http://www.cameronperon.com/2008/09/13/googlepublicis-deal-part-1-%e2%80%93-google%e2%80%99s-chance-to-take-over-performance-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Yanke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameronperon.com/?p=170#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I agree whole heartedly, I am just enthusiastic to this approach because it&#039;s developed a better answer for those looking to market more effectively but are withheld by fears, or budgetary concerns. 

This strikes me more as investing in a needed portion of a business plan web-wide vs. a mere Internet Ad Campaign Cost. Very Exciting, will be looking for more on this on your site.

SeattleC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree whole heartedly, I am just enthusiastic to this approach because it&#8217;s developed a better answer for those looking to market more effectively but are withheld by fears, or budgetary concerns. </p>
<p>This strikes me more as investing in a needed portion of a business plan web-wide vs. a mere Internet Ad Campaign Cost. Very Exciting, will be looking for more on this on your site.</p>
<p>SeattleC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.cameronperon.com/2008/09/13/googlepublicis-deal-part-1-%e2%80%93-google%e2%80%99s-chance-to-take-over-performance-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameronperon.com/?p=170#comment-10</guid>
		<description>At best the gap between paying per click and paying per action will be less wide.  If executed right and on the scale of google&#039;s total inventory it stands to change the game all together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At best the gap between paying per click and paying per action will be less wide.  If executed right and on the scale of google&#8217;s total inventory it stands to change the game all together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Yanke</title>
		<link>http://www.cameronperon.com/2008/09/13/googlepublicis-deal-part-1-%e2%80%93-google%e2%80%99s-chance-to-take-over-performance-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Yanke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameronperon.com/?p=170#comment-9</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s my opinion that this is a very forward thinking approach to demographic marketing. What Google seems to be attempting according to this editorial strikes similar to what Microsoft was wanting to do to a non-existent software industry. Albeit with much less animosity.

When I think of the statement &quot;generate serious revenue&quot; I imagine &quot;serious&quot; to mean targeted, results based, and very pragmatic since people tend to look at advertising and promotion as a &quot;risk&quot;, which is defined as the uncertainty of gain. This approach seems to be taking the &quot;un&quot; a little further away.

-SeattleC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s my opinion that this is a very forward thinking approach to demographic marketing. What Google seems to be attempting according to this editorial strikes similar to what Microsoft was wanting to do to a non-existent software industry. Albeit with much less animosity.</p>
<p>When I think of the statement &#8220;generate serious revenue&#8221; I imagine &#8220;serious&#8221; to mean targeted, results based, and very pragmatic since people tend to look at advertising and promotion as a &#8220;risk&#8221;, which is defined as the uncertainty of gain. This approach seems to be taking the &#8220;un&#8221; a little further away.</p>
<p>-SeattleC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
